JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 18, 1999

A- de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Rey Cantor Ernesto·Respondent -

✓
Topic · hard data
Recurso De Suplica Contra Auto Del Expediente D-2452.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Rechazo por cosa juzgada
  • Suspensión
Juez Constitucional
  • Posibilidad de suspender admisión de demanda
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se denegó la impugnación formulada por el ciudadano de la referencia, en recurso de súplica interpuesto contra el Auto de 26 de julio de 1999 visible a folios 49 a 51 de este cuaderno, providencia que se confirma en su integridad debido a que la los preceptos mencionados fueron analizados por esta Corporación y se concluyó entonces que no quebrantan ninguna norma de la Constitución, por una parte y, por otra, la Corte no limitó los efectos de la sentencia para que pueda predicarse de ella la existencia de cosa juzgada relativa, lo que indica que, conforme a la Carta Política (Art. 243) y de acuerdo con lo preceptuado por el Art. 21 del Decreto 2067 de 1991, la cosa juzgada, en este caso, es absoluta.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. DENEGAR la impugnacion formulada por el ciudadano Ernesto Rey Cantor, en recurso de suplica interpuesto contra el auto de 26 de julio de 1999 visible a folios 49 a 51 de este cuaderno, providencia que se confirma en su integridad.
  2. Notifiquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.